By Marcia Orellana, Jus Tavcar, and Nuria Raul, all staff at FCNL (Friends Committee for National Legislation) Reprinted with permission. First published for FCNL. See https://www.fcnl.org/updates/2023-04/solve-our-most-urgent-challenges-we-must-address-intersection-conflict-climate?
(Nahom Tesfaye/ UNICEF Ethiopia)Climate change, conflict, and migration are three of the most urgent and critical challenges facing the world today. Rising temperatures and frequent climate disasters have led to unprecedented internal and international migration flows. Estimates suggest that more than 30 million migrants will travel across the U.S. border in the next 30 years due to climate displacement.
Climate-driven resource scarcity and increased displacement have exacerbated violence and regional tensions globally. The Institute of Economics and Peace’s 2022 Global Peace Index Report found that global peacefulness has deteriorated for eleven consecutive years, driven mainly by ongoing conflicts around the world. Communities living in conflict zones are often unequipped to adapt to climate shocks. This, in turn, forces yet more people to flee their homes.
These challenges impact and often worsen each other in
obvious ways. The need for governments to address the nexus of climate,
migration, and conflict is clear. Yet too often, these three issues are siloed
from one another. Policies intended to mitigate climate change do not
acknowledge the issue of climate-displaced persons or are not
conflict-sensitive. To be effective, policymakers must instead lead with an
intersectional approach.
A Siloed Approach Harms Our Most Vulnerable Neighbors
Lack of International Legal Protections
Current U.S. and international laws do not integrate
solutions for climate change, migration, and conflict. For example, the most
common international legal framework to protect refugees focuses on people who
face or fear persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political
opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Displacement due to solely
climate change is not considered a basis for refugee protection.
Experts at multilateral organizations have discussed the
difficulty of isolating climate change as a cause of migration from other
political and social causes. The U.N. argues that climate change primarily
drives internal displacement and that migrants should remain under the
responsibility of their own state. However, an increasing number of small
island states are currently in danger due to land loss. Consequentially, their
inhabitants are forced to migrate to other countries. In nations like Kiribati,
it is projected that by 2080 the risk of flooding will be roughly 200 times
higher than at the beginning of the 21st century. The government of Kiribati is
already seeking solutions to address the loss of land, including temporary and
permanent international migration.
Example: Haiti - Conflict, Extreme Weather, and Displacement
The U.S. government has also repeatedly failed to respond to
the severity of complex crises where climate change, migration, and conflict
intersect.
This response ignored the root causes of forced migration and sent thousands of Haitians back to a violent and unstable situation without acknowledging the conflict and vulnerability within the country.
The continued unwillingness of the United States to provide
sufficient assistance to Haitians has worsened the humanitarian and economic
crisis on the island. The lack of resources for climate resilience has
triggered ongoing disaster vulnerability magnified by deforestation and soil
erosion.
What’s Needed
U.S. foreign policy should protect all people who are forced to flee their homes due to conflict and climate change. These individuals and families, too, deserve the opportunity to pursue safe and fruitful lives. Congress must act boldly to create pathways to citizenship for migrants and invest in sufficient foreign assistance to developing countries struggling with the realities of climate change and conflict.
It is impossible to separate the impacts of these issues. In
recognition, Congress should apply an intersectional perspective to its policy
solutions. Internationally, the United States must work with global partners to
update international laws and agreements to mitigate climate change, protect
climate-displaced persons, and interrupt cycles of violence.
Marcia Orellana is the Program Assistant for Migration
Policy at FCNL. Her responsibilities include lobbying and advocating for immigration
reform and migrant assistance. Jus
Tavcar is the program assistant for sustainable energy and environment at FCNL. In his
work, Jus lobbies Congress to pass policies in favor of transitioning into a
just green economy. Nuria Raul assists
the Peacebuilding team in their efforts to lobby for U.S. foreign policy that
aims to prevent and abate violent conflict globally at FCNL.
No comments:
Post a Comment