By
Arnie Alpert and Jon Krieg, American Friends Service Committee; reprinted with
permission, first printed in the Des Moines Register and Concord Monitor
Just (less than a week) before votes are cast in Iowa and New Hampshire ,
the U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassim
Suleimani and Iraqi militia members has at last put matters of foreign and
military policy at the center of the presidential campaign agenda.
The president’s reckless actions place
southwest Asia and the world in great peril, a condition which will
pose tremendous challenges to whomever wins in November. We need all the
presidential candidates to clarify how they intend to provide leadership in a
world poised on the brink of inter-connected crises and war.
Let’s start with Iran and Iraq .
The downward spiral in U.S.-Iran relations
began with the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, in which Iran agreed to verifiable limits on its nuclear program.
Following almost two years of crippling sanctions and now the assassination of
one of its top leaders, Iran has said it will no longer follow some of the provisions in the nuclear
agreement.
Restoration of an Iranian nuclear program is
likely to raise nuclear ambitions in Saudi Arabia and Turkey and intensify the danger of conflict between Iran and the region’s one existing nuclear power, Israel . The Trump administration, for its part, is
escalating the threat of nuclear war and won Congressional approval for new
nuclear weapons designed for battlefield use.
Our question: What will the candidates do to
restore nuclear diplomacy, including the promise of the nuclear
non-proliferation treaty that commits nuclear powers to pursuing nuclear
weapons abolition in exchange for others refraining from acquiring their own
nuclear arsenals?
Last month Congress gave the president a $738
billion military budget, an amount which constitutes more than half of all
discretionary spending. As President Eisenhower said, “Every gun that is made,
every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a
theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not
clothed.”
Our question: Will you call for deep cuts in
Pentagon spending so that funds can be used for climate mitigation, housing,
education, health care, infrastructure, and renewable energy?
Supporters of the president’s drone strike say
it was authorized under the nearly 20-year old Authorizations for the Use of
Military Force (AUMF) resolutions approved by Congress in 2001 and 2002.
Provisions to repeal the AUMFs were stripped from the final versions of the
National Defense Authorization Act and the national security funding package,
which were approved by Congress last month. CNN and Air Force Times have reported
the repositioning of nuclear-capable B-52 bombers to
make them available for attacking Iran .
Our question: As president, will you continue
the trend of presidential unilateralism when it comes to military attacks, or
will you abide by the Constitution, which vests the power to make war in the
authority of Congress?
Shortly after the recent drone strike, U.S. border officials began detaining Iranian-Americans for
questioning at the border. Such mistreatment based on national origin is a
reminder of the racism which underlies U.S. immigration policy.
Our question: Will you shift the priority of
immigration officials from detention, deportation, and denial to one which
allows immigrants to normalize their status and enables migrants fleeing
oppression to apply for and receive asylum?
And a final question: At a time when it is too
easy to imagine how local conflicts can spiral into global conflagration and
the risk of nuclear conflict, how would you exercise leadership so that our
country is a peacemaker and justice builder rather than a flame thrower on a
world stage littered with combustible conditions?
No comments:
Post a Comment